Facebook
RSS

Webinar on : Key Performance Indicators – Strategic Lever for High Performance


Join this 45 minute informative session to understand the capabilities of generating right KPI’s to align the operational performance with your business goals.

A useful maintenance KPI lets you identify the issues causing your maintenance effects and helps you select the right strategy to either support or correct the actions producing the results. The webinar will focus on how analytics can assist you identify KPI that drive business performance, higher equipment reliability and lower operational risks.

Session Content:
  1. How to develop metrics using CMMS data to help monitor overall maintenance & reliability
  2. How analytics can drive your reliability & maintenance operations to align with corporate goals
  3. Develop understanding of leading & lagging indicators
  4. Monitor organizational performance by linking metrics, dashboards & scorecards with detailed operational reports
Register now to understand the capabilities of generating right KPI’s to align the operational performance with your business goals.
[ Read More ]

Webinar on Maintenance Cost Analysis



Session Content:

The webinar on “Maintenance Cost Analysis” will provide insights to make strategic & tactical decisions related to the cost of asset maintenance by leveraging data captured in the CMMS like Maximo & SAP PM. It will cover topics such as

- Maintenance Spend Analysis
- Repair V/S Replace Decisions
- Labor & Spares cost
- Asset life cycle cost analysis & total cost of asset ownership
- Forecasting maintenance and capital cost for planning & budgeting
- ROAI computation
- Maintenance budget monitoring
- Downtime cost estimation & monitoring

Join this webinar and learn how to achieve visibility & control on the cost factors for managing Assets.
[ Read More ]

Webinar | Analytics Framework to Drive Asset Performance Management



This webinar is focused on how analytics framework can drive Asset Performance Management. It will address how organizational goals can be aligned & monitored with all the activities & outcomes related to enterprise assets operations, maintenance, reliability and engineering.

Session Content:

- Developing a maintenance performance framework that aligns maintenance
strategy with business objectives.
- Executing the maintenance strategies and monitoring the performance gaps.
- Attain visibility across business process using advanced data analysis and
reporting techniques like OEE, cost & EHS risk etc.

Key take away :

- Strategies to align your organizational vision and goals related to asset
management
- Understand how to manage and analyze large asset data generated from the
systems
- Holistic approach to performance measurement that assesses the contribution of
the maintenance function to manufacturing and business strategic objectives

To join clinck on following link https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/9zl48/register/5906318422312561152
[ Read More ]

Are you spending time on Planned Downtime?

You can avoid some expensive burn-outs if you opt for preventive maintenance and not reactive maintenance

WE will cross the bridge when it comes. That’s a nice philosophy to have in life.
But not in a plant. Certainly not with machines.
Every machine comes with a suffix called maintenance attached to it.
That’s why the term called AMCs (Annual Maintenance Contracts) is a highlight of many a sales negotiation talk too.
And yet, maintenance is orphaned once the machine gets out of the crib.
The crying baby gets the milk. So is the approach we often take with maintenance too.
But, maintenance is not just strutting about with some nuts and bolts to be used when something screeches, or howls or makes a noise.
Its scope is broad and deep and that’s probably why we still don’t embrace the right approach to maintenance.

Maintenance Approaches:
Maintenance can be broken into categories – Proactive and Reactive. Proactive is further divided into two classes- Preventive and Predictive while Reactive can be split into – Corrective and Emergency.
Reactive maintenance, the easiest approach, the oft-used approach, the out-of-sheer-habit approach. But look closer and you will find that the worst thing that a company can do is spend a lot of time in reactive maintenance.
Reactive approach includes a lot of unplanned downtime in contrast to planned downtime.
Often many reasons incline a company towards reactive way of maintenance. Like:
1. High pressure environment
2. Rigorous production schedules
3. Heavy targets
4. Top Management’s attitude
5. Poor record-keeping making proactive approach infeasible
6. Lack of automation in production-records and scheduling documents
7. Lack of awareness of means and methods of non-disruptive maintenance
8. Ease of application and out of regime
But, this kind of a company is not always a world-class company. Because world-class companies only apportion about 5 per cent of maintenance time to the reactive approach. The major part is done the preventive way. The reasons for doing that are born out of a long-term mindset, focus on sustainability, regard for safety, well-planned direction and a clear vision.
Why Reactive Maintenance costs a lot?
If a plant takes on the routine of repairing only when a problem occurs, it has to bear many outcomes of this neglectful approach:

1. Disruptions in schedules (Example- the way Japanese companies in Electronics and Automotive OEM industry are struggling with capacity-issues and inventory lags)
2. Loss of production man-hours
3. Impact on productivity and quality
4. Greater defects and market pull-outs of products with consequent impact on company image
5. Safety threats ( and associated issues with worker morale and confidence)
6. Over utilization of energy and bad environmental practices
7. Internal supply chain spill-over
8. Resulting
9. Inadequate leverage of AMC benefits

Ways to ensure Preventive Maintenance
It is not that difficult to take the preventive recipe and have planned downtimes. It’s much more beneficial and has a very positive long-term effect, not to mention environmental and sustainability contributions that come as a bonus when a machine is maintained at regular intervals. The ways to do it are simple:

1. Allocate planned hours from night-shifts or evening-or holiday-hours for planned shutdown or a machine outage
2. Automate and organize production records and schedules so as to allow preventive maintenance in an environment of clarity, non-overlap, transparency and control
3. Accumulate certain level of inventory for planned production interruption in advance.
4. Ensure administration of AMC personnel as per time and repair requirements
5. Use redundancies and back-up options for maintaining mission-critical equipment (example- in a turbine or a nuclear reactor or a steel furnace)

Choosing Preventive over Reactive maintenance is a major difference between an average company and a world-class firm.
Which side you want to be is ultimately your choice.
Yes, you can always cross the bridge when it comes but it would not hurt if you have a spare tire and a car in good order. Won’t it?
[ Read More ]

Business challenge selecting the Right Key Performance Indicators



When built into management processes, performance metrics become a system which will generate organizational behaviors that comply with what is measured, i.e., “you are what you measure.” Hence, this will encourage behaviors which help present a good score for the individual or for the department.

This may or may not, however, help to achieve strategic goals. Therefore, when building performance metrics, we must begin with the end result in mind. We need to focus on what we want as outcomes of our work processes. This presents a dilemma, as we do not work as a set of isolated departments, but in collaboration with others. Processes that begin with an individual are continued or completed by others. So, how do we effectively measure outcomes when a single individual or group is not controlling all the key steps?

Several basic frameworks have been proposed to build intelligent metrics that help form sets of composite measures to simplify this problem. For example, the SMART (see accompanying section “Building and Testing Performance Indicators”) test is frequently used to provide a quick reference to determine the quality of a particular performance metric. But these do not, however, address how the measures will interact to stimulate an effective network of key processes. How can individuals see what the effects of their improvements are, if these get lost in the noise of company management reports?

One problem is that business processes are segmented, and many departments are collecting silos of information that produce metrics used only for the sake of measurement. These silos then reinforce divergent opinions of company performance and limit a common understanding of what new behaviors are needed. So, a major factor in implementing performance measurement is changing the way performance is measured and reported and how people view success within their own processes.

For many organizations, this is “where the rubber hits the road:” How can we build realistic, practical metrics which drive change? How can we articulate company objectives through enterprise-wide metrics in an integrated measurement system?
[ Read More ]

Types of maintenance


1. Breakdown maintenance:
In this type of maintenance, no care is taken for the machine, until equipment fails. Repair is then undertaken. This type of maintenance could be used when the equipment failure does not significantly affect the operation or production or generate any significant loss other than repair cost. However, an important aspect is that the failure of a component from a big machine may be injurious to the operator. Hence breakdown maintenance should be avoided.

2. Preventive maintenance:
It is a daily maintenance (cleaning, inspection, oiling and re-tightening), design to retain the healthy condition of equipment and prevent failure through the prevention of deterioration, periodic inspection or equipment condition diagnosis, to measure deterioration. It is further divided into periodic maintenance and predictive maintenance. Just like human life is extended by preventive medicine, the equipment service life can be prolonged by doing preventive maintenance.
2a. Periodic maintenance (Time based maintenance - TBM):
Time based maintenance consists of periodically inspecting, servicing and
cleaning equipment and replacing parts to prevent sudden failure and process
problems. E.g. Replacement of coolant or oil every 15 days.
2b. Predictive maintenance:
This is a method in which the service life of important part is predicted based
on inspection or diagnosis, in order to use the parts to the limit of their
service life. Compared to periodic maintenance, predictive maintenance is
condition-based maintenance. It manages trend values, by measuring and analyzing
data about deterioration and employs a surveillance system, designed to monitor
conditions through an on-line system. E.g. Replacement of coolant or oil, if
there is a change in color. Change in color indicates the deteriorating
condition of the oil. As this is a condition-based maintenance, the oil or
coolant is replaced.

3. Corrective maintenance:
It improves equipment and its components so that preventive maintenance can be carried out reliably. Equipment with design weakness must be redesigned to improve reliability or improving maintainability. This happens at the equipment user level. E.g. installing a guard, to prevent the burrs falling in the coolant tank.

4. Maintenance prevention:
This program indicates the design of new equipment. Weakness of current machines is sufficiently studied (on site information leading to failure prevention, easier maintenance and prevents of defects, safety and ease of manufacturing). The observations and the study made are shared with the equipment manufacturer and necessary changes are made in the design of new machine.
[ Read More ]

An Introduction to Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)

In today’s industrial scenario huge losses/wastage occur in the manufacturing shop floor. This waste is due to operators, maintenance personal, process, tooling problems and non-availability of components in time etc. Other forms of waste includes idle machines, idle manpower, break down machine, rejected parts etc are all examples of waste. The quality related waste are of significant importance as they matter the company in terms of time, material and the hard earned reputation of the company. There are also other invisible wastes like operating the machines below the rated speed, start up loss, break down of the machines and bottle necks in process. Zero oriented concepts such as zero tolerance for waste, defects, break down and zero accidents are becoming a pre-requisite in the manufacturing and assembly industry. In this situation, a revolutionary concept of TPM has been adopted in many industries across the world to address the above said problems.

What is Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)?
It can be considered as the medical science of machines. Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is a maintenance program, which involves a newly defined concept for maintaining plants and equipment. The goal of the TPM program is to markedly increase production while, at the same time, increasing employee morale and job satisfaction.
TPM brings maintenance into focus as a necessary and vitally important part of the business. It is no longer regarded as a non-profit activity. Down time for maintenance is scheduled as a part of the manufacturing day and, in some cases, as an integral part of the manufacturing process. The goal is to hold emergency and unscheduled maintenance to a minimum.

Why TPM?

TPM was introduced to achieve the following objectives. The important ones are listed below.
• Avoid wastage in a quickly changing economic environment.
• Producing goods without reducing product quality.
• Reduce cost.
• Produce a low batch quantity at the earliest possible time.
• Goods send to the customers must be non-defective.

Similarities and differences between TQM and TPM:

The TPM program closely resembles the popular Total Quality Management (TQM) program. Many of the tools such as employee empowerment, benchmarking, documentation, etc. used in TQM are used to implement and optimize TPM. Following are the similarities between the two.

1. Total commitment to the program by upper level management is required in both
programmes
J. Venkatesh Monday, April 16, 2007 1
2. Employees must be empowered to initiate corrective action, and
3. A long-range outlook must be accepted as TPM may take a year or more to
implement and is an on-going process. Changes in employee mind-set toward their
job responsibilities must take place as well.
[ Read More ]

Failure Analysis



Identification of the underlying problem

Whenever a component or product fails in service or if failure occurs in manufacturing or during production processing, failure analysis plays a very important role. In any case, one must determine the cause of failure to prevent future occurrence, and/or to improve the performance of the device, component or structure.

Typical examples of systems/equipment that can be analyzed are electrical generators, heat exchangers, valves, control systems, pumps, components of gas turbines and compressors.

Failure Analysis will disclose;
• Why the event, failure or breakdown occurred
• How future failures can be controlled or eliminated

Analysis to Identify the Causes of Failure / Breakdown

Failure analyses of the repairable systems focus on the model capability to identify, control and eliminate future failures, for a system.
• Root Cause Analysis
• Pareto Analysis for Downtime
• MTBF-MTTR Trending for Bad Assets
• Effect of MTTR on Asset Availability
• Breakdown Analysis
• Identification of Dominant Failure Codes
• Effect of Unplanned Cost on Maintenance Cost
• Analyze Reactive Maintenance
Benefits
• Uses advanced investigative techniques
• Identifies early (unlikely) life failures
• Extends equipment lifetime
• Reduced cost of maintenance
• Improves availability “up-time” and increased production
• Increases safety
• Easy to identify for potential losses where risk is included
[ Read More ]

Equipment Failure Codes


What is a failure code? Quite simply, it is a code that illustrates why an asset failed or the reason that the asset failed. Codes can be a number which is cross referenced to a list of actual code descriptions or more conveniently a series of alphanumeric characters that are a logical abbreviation of their descriptions. However, with modern database technology and available disk space, the full descriptions are increasingly being used instead of alphanumeric codes.

Where are they used?
They are generally used in maintenance systems or more commonly computerized maintenance management systems. They can be used on a work order for an asset or equipment failure. The codes are normally input by the person reporting the problem at the time of failure or by the technician when closing the work order.

Why are they used? Failure codes provide a convenient method of getting statistics about equipment failures or breakdowns. CMMS systems will generally have a reporting function that allows reports to be run on specific failure codes for your equipment. Let's say that you have a machine, which has problems with alignment. You could run a report for a period of time and, by selecting a failure code, determine how many times your machine has had misalignment problems. These statistics are invaluable in any continuous improvement program.

The complexity of the codes will be dependent on the know-how of the system users. For example, if unskilled operators are using the codes to report equipment problems they will have to be of a general nature. Conversely, if trained technical people are the users then the codes can be more complex. For this reason some companies prefer to use both failure codes and problem codes. Problem codes are more a list of symptoms than causes. These would typically be used by operators with the technicians entering the additional failure code after the work was completed.

How are they Formed? Whatever method you chose, your operators and maintenance personnel will soon become familiar with your own codes providing that the list is limited to a manageable number. I firmly believe that there is no need to have more than perhaps 20 or 30 codes and that these need only be of a general nature. For example, if you use your CMMS to report on occurrences of "Misalignment" on a particular piece of equipment those who are familiar with the equipment will know where the misalignment was likely to have occurred, making more specific information unnecessary. Problems will occur when users selecting a code are presented with a drop down list with 50 or 100 codes on it and choosing one becomes difficult. In this case you will find the catch-all "other" being selected too regularly.

If your CMMS supports a hierarchical failure code structure or where codes can be associated to areas or equipment so much the better. In this case you will require more of them simply because they are equipment specific but there may be only 5 or 10 codes for each type of equipment. Functionally this is not a problem because after selecting an asset in the CMMS, users will still only have to choose from the limited number of failure codes associated with that asset.

I have deliberately limited the codes in the illustration below to four characters in an attempt to show that this can provide a good indication of the full description. To prove the effectiveness of this have a look at all the codes and descriptions just once then cover up the descriptions and you will find that you are able to remember most of them. After they have been in use for a week or two you will memorize them all effortlessly.

Alphabetic list of typical Four-Character Codes and Suggested Abbreviations

No CODE DESCRIPTION
1 ARLK Air Leak
2 ALRM Alarm or Problem Indicator
3 BRNG Bearing Problem
4 CALB Calibration Problem
5 DIRT Dirt or Foreign Matter Problem
6 ADJS Equipment Adjustment Required
7 CUTO Equipment Cutting Out
8 JAMD Equipment Jammed
9 HUNG Equipment PC or Microprocessor Hung Up
10 XLUB Excessive Lubrication
11 NOIS Excessive Noise
12 VIBR Excessive Vibration
13 LLUB Lack of Lubrication
14 WIRE Loose or Broken Connection or Wire
15 ALIN Misalignment
16 NAIR No Air
17 NPWR No Power
18 OLLK Oil Leak
19 OPER Operator Error
20 XHOT Overheating or Smoking
21 BROK Part of Equipment is Physically Broken
22 SHRT Short Circuit
23 VNDL Vandalism
24 WTLK Water Leak
25 NOGO Will Not Start

The above codes are of a very general nature and some of them may be considered to be more like problem codes than failure codes but you will find that almost all your failures can be linked to one of them. It is also recognized that you will have local requirements that may mean adding a few more of your own. If this is the case you may also find that you can drop some of those provided if they are inapplicable.

Additional functionality can be added to the codes to suit your own site. For example a number 1, 2 or 3 could be added to indicate priority or seriousness of the failure. A problem with excessive vibration could then become 1VIBR, 2VIBR or 3VIBR dependent on the reporter's perception of the seriousness of the problem. Alternatively (or additionally), you could add a letter A, B or C to represent the shift when the problem occurred.

In conclusion, the methods outlined in this document are those recommended by the writer. We do recognize that here are other ways of doing things and we are always interested to here about these.
[ Read More ]

Unlock the potential of Analytics for Planning, Scheduling and Work Management

For registration please click on the link below
https://www4.gotomeeting.com/register/168370295

Maximo manages large amount of work orders challenging to prioritize ,plan and schedule work order with constraints like labor availability, materials ,tools, services and asset availability .These may impact your operations ,maintenance ,reliability & engineering in one or many ways like:
- Pending PM compliance
- More failures and less reliability
- Increased productivity loss
- Increased wrench time
Join us on the webinar to overcome these issues.
Key takeaway:
- Understand & manage WO backlog
- Effective ways to improve planning & scheduling
- Understanding future work
- Understand planning compliance
[ Read More ]

Maintenance Approaches - Proactive and Reactive


Maintenance can be broken into categories – Proactive and Reactive. Proactive is further divided into two classes- Preventive and Predictive while Reactive can be split into – Corrective and Emergency.
Reactive maintenance, the easiest approach, the oft-used approach, the out-of-sheer-habit approach. But look closer and you will find that the worst thing that a company can do is spend a lot of time in reactive maintenance.
Reactive approach includes a lot of unplanned downtime in contrast to planned downtime.

Often many reasons incline a company towards reactive way of maintenance. Like:
1. High pressure environment
2. Rigorous production schedules
3. Heavy targets
4. Top Management’s attitude
5. Poor record-keeping making proactive approach infeasible
6. Lack of automation in production-records and scheduling documents
7. Lack of awareness of means and methods of non-disruptive maintenance
8. Ease of application and out of regime

But, this kind of a company is not always a world-class company. Because world-class companies only apportion about 5 per cent of maintenance time to the reactive approach. The major part is done the preventive way. The reasons for doing that are born out of a long-term mindset, focus on sustainability, regard for safety, well-planned direction and a clear vision.
[ Read More ]

You can avoid some expensive burn-outs if you opt for preventive maintenance and not reactive maintenance



WE will cross the bridge when it comes. That’s a nice philosophy to have in life.
But not in a plant. Certainly not with machines.

Every machine comes with a suffix called maintenance attached to it.
That’s why the term called AMCs (Annual Maintenance Contracts) is a highlight of many a sales negotiation talk too.

And yet, maintenance is orphaned once the machine gets out of the crib.
The crying baby gets the milk. So is the approach we often take with maintenance too.

But, maintenance is not just strutting about with some nuts and bolts to be used when something screeches, or howls or makes a noise.

Its scope is broad and deep and that’s probably why we still don’t embrace the right approach to maintenance.
[ Read More ]

Your Assets Need Care



Exercising 20 minutes every morning is better than a heart-transplant. Won’t the same common sense apply to your maintenance and reliability?

Have you thought about it?
It seems intriguing and yet so true.
As engineers lost in the iron-clad world of engines, assembly lines, tool-boxes, turbines and metal all around; it’s easy to forget what machines are all about.

It’s easy to forget that just because they are machines, they can not be treated with some attributes a human is naturally eligible for – care, attention and rest.

While the human resources in your factory get the above entities as fair rights and can even rouse a commotion if neglected for long; machines can not make noise about their rights.
Nevertheless, they too need some attention, care and break-time. They might not have a Union to represent their case but beware of the noise they might make, at the wrong time and at very wrong decibels.

Ask yourself some brutal and candid questions – Do you treat maintenance as a necessary evil? Just as a formality? Often neglect it? Even when done, it’s only with a ‘we will fix it when it breaks’ approach?

How many of us would laugh at a word like ‘Planned Downtime’?
How many of us scoff a term called ‘Preventive Maintenance’?
How many of us would shrug shoulders when asked about the number of hours devoted to regular upkeep of machines?

Now answer this one.
How many of us would mock a doctor if s/he suggests you to exercise, take preventive medicine or vaccination to stay away from heart attacks?

The ‘you must be kidding’ guffaw suddenly vanishes.
Answers vary, right?
Take a moment here before it’s too late to amend.

A machine may not have a heart but the rules of preventive healthcare apply to it in almost an equal degree.
Preventive maintenance is not an alien term these days. Not at least in world-class companies or in international counter parts. Sadly, the state of affairs is very acutely dismal in India.

Just like a medical emergency can be avoided by regular and preventive healthcare, so can plant emergencies be avoided, if care of machines entails preventive maintenance, instead of reactive maintenance.

For the uninitiated, preventive genre of maintenance is something that is done via planned downtime and predictive shutdowns.

Critics and naysayers apropos this concept may argue that it’s all a Phirang concept and very very copybook style, hence not being practical at all.

Reasons you avoid it

Some arguments are reasonable. Yes, an engineer’s plate is always full of hectic schedules, tight deadlines, production targets etc. If one has to be competitive and be on the top, one can’t afford to waste time on planned outages and other stuff. So many big deals and orders would than just pass us by like a ship in the night, is a plausible question.
But ponder again, with that kind of an attitude, would the same company be able to hold the appellation of being ‘big’ or ‘major’ as one may proudly refer to it. It’s not a world class company if it treats maintenance like a step-child, right?

Any international-level comparison is proof enough that great companies treat preventive-reactive maintenance in an 85 per cent: 5 per cent split. It’s weird that top management of companies in India is so negligent. So it’s not all theory and idealistic. In fact, preventive approach is more pragmatic than quixotic.

Consider the healthcare analogy here.

People are ready to take the risk of a long sick leave, lifelong maladies, costly surgeries, obnoxious chemical doses and treatments, and utter physical discomfort but they would always shrug off one day of annual medical check-up or 15 minutes of daily exercise. Who has got the time, is the rhetoric one often hears.

But isn’t vaccination always a better option? If you spare one day or small breaks to save you a big stretch of unproductive and distressing treatment time, what’s the harm? Specially because in some cases, it can save lives.

Machines or humans; both depreciate with time, both can breakdown, but if you keep taking the breaks for fitness and health, the longevity is visible. So is productivity.

There are always some hours one can take out from an evening or night time window. One can plan your inventory in advance so that planned downtime does not interrupt production targets. Even if it is mission-critical equipment, let’s say in a turbine or a nuclear reactor, one can always use redundancies and back-up.

Whether it’s the heart or a big machine, the arteries need to be lubricated timely, else they fail, and in most cases without any warning. A heart attack always hurts.

Side-effects

The truth is harsh and there is a much bigger picture to preventive maintenance than mere productivity improvement, or averting last-minute breakdowns.
Engineers or technically inclined professionals are cogent, intelligent and in a better position to make a difference to this world, and yet they don’t use these powers. They say the opposite of love is not hatred but indifference. Isn’t it anything but indifference that ultimately leads to grave tragedies like BP oil leak or Bhopal gas incident? Think about the safety hazards, the environmental repercussions and over-energy-usage that are a direct backwash of maintenance-neglect.

Look closer, and we will discover the crevices where we let it slip away.
One major gap is the way we document and manage production-records. There’s a conspicuous lack of proper systems or automation on that area, which deters preventive maintenance. And that coupled with management’s attitude is also the reason why even well-chalked out AMCs (Annual Maintenance Contracts) are not administered properly.

The long-term repercussions of these gaps can be quite huge.

When, a machine breaks down abruptly, it’s hard to fix it on the go. The spare parts are not always available. It takes some time to retune something when it goes out of kilter.

Then there are other implications. Those hours of reactive repair translate into time-creeps, schedules going awry, quality getting affected, supply chain getting hammered and of course the eventual impact on top line, bottom line, lost man hours, and sometimes serious safety issues. It’s funny how we forget that small mosquitoes can upset even an elephant.


And yet, we still ignore the obvious woodcutter’s rule of sharpening one’s axe.
Your machine is your axe. It helps you to cut through all those targets, ambitious projects and business momentum with efficiency. That’s exactly why it’s wiser to sharpen it once in a while.

After all there’s still that time-tested adage – A break is always better than a breakdown.
[ Read More ]

A driving lesson for operations and maintenance


Picture this. Personnel from a plant are driving along a road in an automobile. The maintenance manager is driving blindfolded. Sitting beside the maintenance manager is the mill manager who is peering in the rear view mirror. In the back seat, the production manager is urging the maintenance manager to proceed at top speed while simultaneously warning him about a flat tire.

This situation is obviously out of control. In a plant setting, it is equally out of control. Plant management frequently focuses on past data analysis rather than future improvements. Maintenance is often “blindfolded” due to tight short-term cost control measures instead of long-term results. Meanwhile, the operations group is becoming desperate and therefore dictates what maintenance should do.

The behavior described has many names—the circle of despair, unplanned maintenance, or reactive maintenance. Whatever name you prefer, you must understand the point from a maintenance perspective. Maintenance work needs management through good maintenance planning and scheduling. How does one start such an improvement? From the thousands of possible ways to start, this post will discuss a starting point: “Maintenance and Operations 101.”

One key element of an operations and maintenance partnership is well-organized daily or weekly planning and scheduling meetings. Although you may already have these meetings, are they as productive as they could be? The purpose of such meetings is finalizing a schedule and possibly finalizing minor planning. The meeting objectives or agenda are the following:
• Review work from yesterday
• Update work for today
• Finalize work for tomorrow
• Finalize schedule for following week by 2 PM on Friday
• Track planning and scheduling of key metrics
• Schedule 100% of work force including contractors
• Resolve new work requests.

The meeting should be attended by the area or department operations representatives, maintenance supervisors, and planners. The operations liaison must have sufficient clout to set a schedule without overriding by others after the meeting. Maintenance should represent both mechanical and E/I maintenance.
The meeting should occur mid-day and last no longer than 20 minutes. Keeping the meeting to this limit with effective results requires the following:
• Having a priority chart: Planning for work in the backlog before the meeting
• Knowing the availability of people
• Realizing that all meeting agreements are final—any change is break-in work.

Tracking the performance of these meetings is critical. Upper management must drive—not simply support—the planning and scheduling meetings. A simple scorecard (available at the web site noted above) will help. The scorecard tracks the following:
• Did all the proper people attend?
• Did attendees do their preparatory work?
• What is the level of unapproved work orders in the backlog?
• Was the first cut of the schedule for the following week posted on time?

In addition to the meeting indicators, the group should track the classic planning and scheduling indicators such as scheduling compliance, planning compliance, paper machine compliance, etc.
[ Read More ]

Webinar - "Maximo data analysis and reporting for asset reliability and maintenance"

More than 200 Maintenance and Reliability professionals attended this webinar on Maximo data analysis and reporting. The webinar covered the different aspects of Maintenance and Reliability and also showcased some real life reports like, PM performance, RCM, WO management, Failure Analysis, MTBF, MTTF, RCA , cost analysis and many more.

To view the recording of this webinar please click http://www.assetanalytix.com/view-webinar
[ Read More ]